Saturday, 18 April 2015

HRM vs Personnel management.

Human resource management past and present

Human resource management has changed a lot in the past 100 years. Previously, HRM was called personnel administration or personnel management, that is, it had to do with the staff or workers of an organisation. It was mainly concerned with the administrative tasks that have to do with organising or managing an organisation, such as record keeping and dealing with employee wages, salaries and benefits. The personnel officer (the person in charge of personnel management) also dealt with labour relations.such as problems with trade unionsor difficulties between employers (those who employ workers) and their employees. Before we look at the role of HRM in organisations today, we will examine the way people were managed in organisations in the past.


Definition 

Personnel Management - Personnel Management is thus basically an administrative record-keeping function, at the operational level. Personnel Management attempts to maintain fair terms and conditions of employment, while at the same time, efficiently managing personnel activities for individual departments etc. It is assumed that the outcomes from providing justice and achieving efficiency in the management of personnel activities will result ultimately in achieving organizational success. 

Facts [+]


The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is the world's largest HR department. OPM provides HR services for the federal governments workforce of nearly 2.8 million workers. It's staff carry out the tasks to recruit, interview, and promote employees; oversee merit pay, benefits and retirement programs; and ensure that all employees and applicants are treated fairly and according to the law.

To set the COLA [cost-of-living allowances] rates, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) surveys the prices of over 300 items, including goods and services, housing, transportation, and miscellaneous expenses. OPM conducts these surveys in each of the COLA areas and in the Washington, DC, area. 


Human resource management is concerned with the development and implementation of people strategies, which are integrated with corporate strategies, and ensures that the culture, values and structure of the organization, and the quality, motivation and commitment of its members contribute fully to the achievement of its goals. 

HRM is concerned with carrying out the SAME functional activities traditionally performed by the personnel function, such as HR planning, job analysis, recruitment and selection, employee relations, performance management, employee appraisals, compensation management, training and development etc. But, the HRM approach performs these functions in a qualitatively DISTINCT way, when compared with Personnel Management. 




Main Differences between Personnel Management and HRM 

HRM has a long history of growing from a simple welfare and maintenance function to that of a board level activity of the companies. In recent years, the focus on people management from human capital/intellectual capital perspective is also shaping firmly. However, the hard fact is that this growth can be generally witnessed in management literature and rarely in practice. Peripheral observation of people management in organization can mislead the observers since, hardly there could be any organization that is yet to rename its old fashioned title of industrial relations/personnel/welfare/administration department into HRM department. But, in practice, these organizations continue to handle the people management activities the way they had been handling earlier. The reasons for this could be many and varied. Among them, the potential reason is lack of clear understanding about the differences between personnel/IR and HRM. 



Professor John Storey
 brilliantly portrayed these differences in 27 areas of people management in 1992 in his book titled Developments in the Management of Human Resources. These differences are illustrated in Table 


Dimensions
Personnel and IR
HRM
Beliefs and assumptions
1. Contract
Careful delineation of written contracts
Aim to go beyond contract
2. Rules
Importance of devising clear rules/mutually
'Can-do' outlook; Impatience with 'rule'
3. Guide to management action
Procedures
Business-need'
4. Behaviour referent
Norms/custom and practice
Values/mission
5. Managerial task vis-a-vis labour
Monitoring
Nurturing
6. Nature of relations
Pluralist
Unitarist
7. Conflict
Institutionalized
De-emphasized
Strategic aspects
8. Key relations
Labour management
Customer
9. Initiatives
Piecemeal
Integrated
10. Corporate plan
Marginal
Central
11. Speed of decision
Slow
Fast
Line management
12. Management role
Transactional
Transformational leadership
13. Key managers
Personnel/ IR specialists
General/business/line managers
14. Communication
Indirect
Direct
15. Standardization
High (e.g. 'parity' an issue)
Low (e.g. 'parity' not seen as relevant)
16. Prized management skills
Negotiation
Facilitation
Key levers
17.  Selection
Separate, marginal task
Integrated, key task
18. Pay
Job evaluation (fixed grades)
Performance-related
19. Conditions
Separately negotiated
Harmonization
20. Labour-management
Collective bargaining contracts
Towards individual contracts
21. Thrust of relations with stewards
Regularized through facilities and training
Marginalized (with exception of some bargaining for change models)
22.  Job categories and grades
Many
Few
23.  Communication
Restricted flow
Increased flow
24.  Job design
Division of labour
Teamwork
25.  Conflict handling
Reach temporary truces
Manage climate and culture
26. Training and development
Controlled access to courses
Learning companies
27.  Foci of attention for interventions
Personnel procedures
Wide ranging cultural, structural and personnel strategies

No comments:

Post a Comment